Motion to ban fowl play

26/Nov/2008

Average Rating: 4 stars

Comments: 14 readers have left a comment

ROOSTER owners in the Shire of Kalamunda may have to move house or give up their hobby if the council approves a motion to ban people in a residential zone from keeping roosters, peafowl, geese or turkey.

Several neighbouring councils, including the City of Swan, have already imposed strict regulations regarding poultry.

At last week’s Kalamunda Shire Council meeting, Councillor Pauline Tonkin proposed that roosters and other specified birds on residential property be prohibited due to noise complaints.

West Australian Poultry Association secretary Geoff Blinco said strict council regulations had forced poultry fanciers to the outer suburbs.

He moved from a residential property in Midvale to a semi-rural property in Upper Swan to escape a similar ban.

“Some people do not have the finances to move house or might not want to move so they have to give up their hobby,” he said.

“The effect of this is that we lose members, lose exhibitors and lose the next generation of poultry fanciers.”

Midland Junction Poultry Society secretary Noelene Teague said she was against the banning of roosters.

“A rooster crowing does annoy some people but barking dogs are much worse,” she said.

“If you live in the Hills environment, which is pretty rural anyway, you can expect to hear noise from birds such as pink and grey galahs and black cockies.

“Compared to those birds, the sound of a roster crowing is nothing.”

Ms Teague said that fancy breeds were facing extinction because of rooster bans on suburban blocks.

“Without a rooster we cannot reproduce the gene pool of certain breeds,” she said.

“It is a hobby but we’re also the custodians of certain breeds. If poultry fanciers aren’t allowed to have a rooster they can’t reproduce the breed and eventually it will die out.”

Ms Teague said council rules, regulations and restrictions were affecting all poultry clubs.

“Our numbers are decreasing year after year,” she said.

What Do You Think?

What everyone else is thinking

Michael

04/01/2009

I have two Chinese Silkies in my suburban backyard that I feel compelled to let go because of the crowing rooster. They are delightful animals but there is the inconvenience factor to our neighbours that I can no longer ignore. Does anyone want them please, I will deliver, Michael, 0418909872

judy

26/12/2008

I've lived here on a 1/2 acre block since 1978. We have always had chooks - but only occasionally a little bantam rooster so the children could experience the broody hens, accumulating eggs, and then finally the wonder of hatching chicks. The little bantam roosters are very busy and entertaining - but their 'crowing' is more of a joke than anything to be upset about - and recently having a braying donkey in residence next door for a few weeks - now THERE is something to behold!! The silence was truely golden when he moved on...

When we moved here we were delighted with all the wild bird noises and the screeching baby galahs every spring. A silent 'Home in the Forest' would surely a 'dead' forest.

Frank

22/12/2008

In response to some comments I've read, I have lived here for 37 years and roosters were here before we made our home in the hills. Our children and our grandchildren have grown up with the sound of roosters crowing and love seeing them and helping to feed them and collecting the eggs from hens. They learn that eggs are made from Roosters & hens and that the eggs come from hens and not just an egg carton from the shop and also see how chicks hatch. I agree with comments that if Roosters are a problem then do we ban other noisy birds & animals also? I don't think so.

Pauline focus on more importants issues within the shire and leave our Roosters alone.

ros raymond

16/12/2008

There is something not quite right about the comments made by Michael, Hugh and Elizabeth. I live near a number of people who have poultry and the rooster crowing is nothing like they describe. It happens at intervals, not constantly as they describe. In fact the worst noise of all at the moment is the constant screeching of the red tailed black cockatoo juveniles. It's unthinkable that we would ban them. They're only doing what comes naturally and so are the roosters.Why not talk to your neighbours and work something out?

Stanley

16/12/2008

Isn't it possable to stop a rooster crowing by keeping it in a yard with a low wire mesh roof so it cant stretch its neck high to crow and on a perch in the fowl house with a low plank above its head, it could then still be let out into a bigger yard during certain hours of the day to play.

Tom

11/12/2008

It may be fair to ban roosters on blocks under 1000 sqm.
Otherwise roosters should be allowed on the proviso that neighbours are allowed to object if their lifestye is seriously affected.
Of more serious concern are the cars hooning around and the noisy trailbikes.

bignanna

05/12/2008

It brings back beautiful memories of chooks in the suburban back yard with the rooster, sorry everybody love the sound of Mr Rooster. We also have in our area, white cockie, black cockies, magpies, crows, pigeons, doves, seagulls and wood chucks love them all waking up early in the morning listening to the birds whether native or Mr Rooster very soothing for me, some people need to get out and sniff the air, need to get out and listen to nature, need to get a life. Pack of snobs all of them. Oh I live in Kalamunda in the hills. ooooooh dear.

Pat

30/11/2008

I feel sad that so many people find the sound of a rooster distressing as it is one of the few sounds we have left in Lesmurdie that reminds us of how it used to be in a semi rural area.

We used to hear sheep baaing, cows mooing and horses neighing but with suburbia creeping up on us these sounds have all disappeared.

I personally get comfort from hearing another being awake when I am.

carole

30/11/2008

I have lived in the Shire of Kalamunda for nearly 20 years. We have enjoyed the quiet lifestyle till about a year ago when a neighbour moved in with his noisey caged birds. We have to listen to them from sun-up to sun-down every day so we can sympathise with people dealing with rooster noise. The statement by Ms. Teague about barking dogs being worse is rediculous. You can stop a dog barking by taking different forms of action but can she tell me how you stop birds squawking and screeching all day.

Michael

28/11/2008

I have lived in the Kalamunda Shire for over 35 years. I agree with the motion to ban roosters & other noisy fowl in residential areas of the Shire. There are plenty of rural and semi-rural areas located in the Shire where people can establish their poultry farms, so as not to cause a nuisance in residential areas. The nuisance factor involves not only noise but also the noxious odours & increase in the fly and rodent population which invariably accompany the keeping of poultry. Surrounding local authorities already ban roosters & other noisy fowl in residential areas, so the Kalamunda Shire must act now & follow suite in order to prevent people moving here purposefully to keep noisy fowl in residential areas.

Hugh

28/11/2008

We have lived in the Shire of Kalamunda for 27 years and have enjoyed the peaceful lifestyle. Unfortunately last year this was destroyed by a rooster breeder moving into the neighbourhood from an enlightened shire that cared for the vast majority of its residents by banning these irritating noise machines. Forget the old fashioned feeling of a rooster crowing, these crow every few seconds all day. Rooster breeders are not happy with a single rooster they want as many as possible. Why should they come into our Shire devalue properties, attract flies and vermin in what was a very pleasant suburb. Well done Pauline Tonkin, a woman who has the courage to stand up for what is probably 99% of the residents.

elizabeth

28/11/2008

A"Petition" from residents sick of listening to daily constant noise of Roosters was given to Councillor Tonkin & we pray the motion to ban them will be passed. All Shires in the State, except Kalamunda, has either banned Roosters or require written approval from the Shire to keep any.
I've been here over 20 years so I know what a Hills lifestyle means & that is a "Home in the Forest" not a "Life on the Farm". Why should my lifestyle be threatened by people moving into the area to "Breed Roosters. What gives Rooster owners the right to dictate & affect my lifestyle, why should I now have to sit inside with the doors & windows closed so I don't have to listen to Roosters "ALL DAY". Why should I have to now walk around my garden with a IPod to block out the noise of Roosters crowing "ALL DAY"
Why should I have to put up with the terrible smell, the increase in flies & rats

Belle

27/11/2008

I grew up with chickens & roosters on only 1/2 an acre of land in the Mundaring shire. All my friends & neighbours had to get rid of their roosters a few years ago due to some changes in the local laws. We all really miss not only our pets but also the sounds of the roosters crowing, it's such a lovely sound hearing the 5-6 local roosters talking to each other. I could understand if someone had to live right next door to 30 or so roosters, but if the roosters were there first someone chose to build their new house next to a chicken yard, well thats their choice & its not fair for the owners of the birds to remove them. It is so sad that people have to complain about a rooster crowing (which is not a constant all day noise) but yet dogs are allowed to yap NON STOP for months, even years but nothing is done to fix this problem. This is just another ridiculous law to suit people who know nothing about a hills lifestyle.

George lalley

26/11/2008

I have lived in the Shire of Kalamunda for 28 years. There has been times when the Shire Council have made decisions that affect the whole Community, some good some bad. If Councillor Tonkin is successful in having her motion approved by the Council then it will be a sad day indeed. While the Council are considering this motion why not look at other issues and take all the fun out of life all together for pet owners, such as banning dogs who bark at night. Let's not stop there, lets ban cats that roam around at night and scratch the paintwork on cars. We could also ban noisy residents. Narrow minded attitudes will and always have ruined communities. Wouldn't it be better for the Shire to deal with an individual complaint in an effort to to resolve an issue rather than a blanket ban being imposed on everyone.

Share your thoughts in 60 seconds!

Members : login to comment